A General Right to Strike Not For Giving Away - 23 April 2007
The union movement has a long history of struggle to win and protect the right to strike.
Since the 1800’s the employers and various governments have sought to impose penal laws against the right to strike. It was not until the 1993 ALP Keating government that labour laws were enacted which included some freedom for unions, when bargaining collectively on behalf of workers at an enterprise level, to access a limited right to strike. It was called ‘protected action’ (i.e. protected against the common law and statute law so workers could not be legally punished in specific circumstances). This enterprise bargaining industrial action was not unlawful and accepted by all, including most employer organisations at the time.
The International Labour Organisation, the ILO, has over time established certain minimum standards that form the basis for union and worker rights.
For example there is the ILO convention No. 87 Freedom of Association and the Right to Organise Convention (1948), and the ILO convention No. 98, Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention (1949). Both were ratified by the Whitlam government in 1973 and are binding. Their status was further highlighted by the ILO Declaration on the Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work in 1998.
The ILO also emphasised their principle position on the right to strike back in 1983, with the following declaration:
This right to strike, as part of the ‘freedom of association’ concept remains a basic workers’ right and is ACTU policy. The union principle is to argue to be able to withdraw labour without sanctions, when aggrieved or affected workers are moved to do so. Many issues do and can arise outside the enterprise agreement process.
Regardless, ‘Workchoices’ severely restricts protected industrial action, even within the enterprise bargain process, by making it compulsory for unions to comply with a complex legal process including requirements for secret ballots.
Australian labour history shows strikes occur via fair and democratic votes. Union leaders do not force workers to strike. This has always been a conservative myth over many years. Democratic decision-making is important but no evidence compels the ‘lack of democracy’ allegation that is being used currently. It is union business how union members’ meetings are conducted, it is not employers or government business.
Lets be blunt, Workchoices virtually extinguishes the right to strike. This is a clear break from the century-old practice within the Australian Industrial history. Workers need collective rights to exercise economic pressure through promising to, or actually undertaking, industrial action (often as a last resort), in order to balance the unequal bargaining powers between employers and workers. Workers and their unions in dispute are now in twenty-first century Australia liable to be ordered back to work, fined, sued and even criminalised, with extremely high penalties.
These points need to be made because of the current debate around Federal ALP policy leading up to the 2007 Federal election.
****************************************************************
[The above statement is adapted and edited from a speech given by the VTHC Secretary before the taking of the Labour Day toast at the VTHC Labour Day Dinner Friday 20 April 2007 held at Moonee Valley Racing Club].
More Archive
-
Howard's demise: a win for workers
2007 - Nov - 27The result of the recent Federal Election (24/11) is cause for great celebration for workers in general and the organised labour movement in particular. It was first and foremost a plebiscite on John Howard’s draconian WorkChoices legislation. ...read more
-
Building Workers at Pointy End of Howard’s IR Laws
2007 - Nov - 12As we head into the last days of the federal election campaign it is worth re-capping on some of the more nasty aspects of John Howard’s draconian IR policies....read more
-
Federal Election must see Howard Government defeated Monday 15 October 2007
2007 - Oct - 15Federal Election must see Howard Government defeated
15 October 2007...read more -
Pertinent and timely comments by Kim Beazley - 21 September 2007
2007 - Sep - 21Yesterday (20 September 2007) in his address to the Federal Parliament, former ALP Federal Opposition Leader, Kim Beazley, made some important comments about the trade union movement....read more
-
A people’s alternative to APEC - Seeing Howard’s IR Laws within the Bigger Picture…”
2007 - Sep - 03More and more Australians are beginning to see the links between the policies that come out of Canberra and the requirements of U.S. policy....read more
-
Dr Haneef case exposes the lack of rights with 457 Work visas
2007 - Aug - 06When the bodgey terrorist legal case against Dr Mohamed Haneef recently fell to pieces, the federal government still held a ‘trump card’, the ability to pull the Sec. 457 visa that allowed him to come to work in Australia in the first place....read more
-
Union Defence Campaign of 2004-2007
2007 - Jul - 12In the lead up to the Federal election it may be timely to explore the role of the major union and community mass mobilisations and protests against the Howard government’s IR laws, particularly since the October 2004 Federal election result....read more
-
MUA in 1998 - WE'RE NOT
2007 - Jun - 04The MUA 1998 Waterfront dispute was indeed a watershed event that goes to the heart of the Howard Government’s anti-union, anti-worker vendetta, that began in earnest in 1996 and is ongoing....read more
-
We must defeat John Howard – March 28 2007
2007 - Mar - 27Still plenty of things to do to achieve this end...read more
